- Tesla didn’t register the Cybercab trademark forward of its unveiling.
- One other firm beat Tesla to submitting for the trademark.
- The USPTO has suspended Tesla’s software till the opposite firm decides to register or drop the Cybercab title declare.
Transfer quick and break issues is the standard Silicon Valley mantra. Sadly for Tesla, so is speaking large earlier than taking motion in a well timed method (ahem, Full Self-Driving and Robotaxis). That second piece introduced forth a slip-up which can have price Tesla large: the Cybercab title.
A delay in submitting paperwork led the United States Patent and Trademark Workplace to suspending Tesla’s software to register the Cybercab trademark forward of the automobile’s launch. The rationale? Another person beat them to the punch.

Photograph by: Tesla
In keeping with a authorities submitting noticed by Electreka french beverage firm known as Unibev filed for the Cybercab trademark a number of weeks forward of Tesla, that means that it is first in line. Unibev even utilized to make use of the title for autos, identical to Tesla did.
It seems that when Tesla unveiled the Cybercab on October 10, 2024 and CEO Elon Musk name-dropped the product, Tesla hadn’t but truly filed a trademark software. Unibev determined to maneuver in and filed for the trademark itself almost three weeks in a while October 28. Tesla filed with the USPTO the next month.
“Motion on this software is suspended till the prior-filed software(s) beneath both registers or abandons,” the USPTO wrote in a letter to Tesla.
The USPTO requires that logos be distinct, don’t have any conflicts with different logos, utilized in commerce (or has intent to be) and has the potential to be a “supply identifier”—that means that customers can simply pinpoint that phrase to a model. As a result of Unibev filed for the trademark forward of Tesla’s registration, it takes priority and, if granted, Tesla’s use of Cybercab would not tick not less than a type of bins. To make sure, Unibev does not personal the trademark but, as its software continues to be listed as pending.
What’s odd is that Unibev appears to have performed this recreation with Tesla earlier than. The corporate holds three logos for drinks named “Teslaquila,” the title the automaker as soon as tried to make use of for its limited-run liquor. (Tesla finally deserted that branding, however due to Mexican regulators not any trademark squatting.)
However the Cybercab nameplate is unquestionably a much bigger deal within the grand scheme of issues for the automaker. That is the two-seat, steering wheel-free autonomous pod that’s presupposed to catapult Tesla into the longer term. And Tesla goals to begin making them at scale this yr.
This is not precisely a loss of life sentence for the Cybercab title. A majority of these trademark disputes do occur. Tesla might problem it, and even probably negotiate a monetary treatment with Unibev.
From the surface, it seems like Tesla was unprepared to launch its product—however when the corporate has made so many abrupt pivots and guarantees across the Cybercab and associated platforms, it is not likely shocking. Regardless, it’s a dangerous search for Tesla to have its hallmark product title usurped by an organization unrelated firm.
